How An AI-written Book Shows Why The Tech Frightens Creatives

For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.


"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.


Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.


It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.


It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating data about me.


Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.


There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.


There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.


When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.


A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language model.


I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.


There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and joy".


Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.


He intends to expand his variety, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and wiki.fablabbcn.org possibly providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.


It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.


Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.


"We should be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually imply human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.


"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."


In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.


"I do not think the use of generative AI for innovative purposes need to be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective but let's build it fairly and fairly."


OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps


DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking


China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger


In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.


The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' material on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.


Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".


He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.


"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.


Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.


"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.


"The federal government is weakening one of its finest performing markets on the vague promise of growth."


A federal government representative said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."


Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library including public data from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.


In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.


In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.


But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.


This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.


They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and used it to train their systems.


The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.


If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.


DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.


As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.


But offered how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure for how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are better.


Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.


Outside the UK? Register here.